Skip to content

AI for Business

AI for business, applied to one real job at a time.

Sahla works out where AI is worth using in your operation, builds the systems that do it, and helps with the AI you run inside your own business. Each one starts from a single real job: reading documents, forecasting demand, answering from your own knowledge. Each gets tested for the ways it fails before it goes near production, and you own what we build.

Most AI is sold as magic. We start by telling you where it is not worth using, build only what is, and hand you a version you own.

What we build

Five jobs AI for business does, and what each one looks like running.

Pick a job to see the real input on one side and what the AI returns on the other.

Input · supply agreement, 14 pages
Output · clauses and dates
Renewal date · flagged14 Nov 2026cl. 8.2
Notice period90 dayscl. 8.3
Risk linePrice escalation is uncappedcl. 11.1
Every field links back to the clause it came from.

Every one of these ships with the evaluation below. That part is not optional.

How we test it

We test the AI we build. Every time.

Every build ships with a set of checks, or it does not ship. We assume it will be attacked, and we assume it will sometimes be wrong. The checks exist to decide what happens then.

#CheckWhat it meansIf it fails
01Grounding & factualityPassingAnswers trace to a real source in your material, and the source is shown.Block the answer
02Permission leakPassingIt will not surface data the person asking is not allowed to see.Block and log
03Prompt injectionPassingA crafted message cannot override the instructions it was given.Flag for review
04Task accuracyMeasuredMeasured against an acceptance set we agree with you before the build.Send to a person

For anything with weight, a person signs off before it acts.

This is the shape of the checks, not a report on one build. The thresholds are set with you before work starts, and what each check returns is specific to the system it is testing.

Own your AI

Vendor-owned or your own. We build both.

An AI assistant runs on a model, and that model is either the vendor’s or yours. Send your work out to a top-tier third-party model and someone else keeps it running. Run a top-tier local model inside your business and nothing leaves. Both are real options, both are good ones, and the answer depends on whether your data is allowed to leave. We build either, and the parts that matter are the same in both.

Vendor-ownedA top-tier third-party model, run by the company that made it.
Where your work goes
Out to the vendor, and back with the answer.
What you run
Nothing. The vendor keeps it running.
Choose it when
That is the right call for the job.
Your ownA top-tier local model, running inside your business.
Where your work goes
Nowhere. It stays inside your own walls.
What you run
The model itself, on your side.
Choose it when
The data cannot leave.
The same either way, because we build both
  • You control where anything is sent.
  • Every question asked and every answer given is recorded inside your business.
  • Switching from one to the other is a change to how it is set up, not a rebuild.

Where we would tell you not to use it.

Some decisions should not be handed to a model. We would rather say so in the first conversation than after you have paid for a build.

  • Decisions with legal, financial or safety weight — a person stays in the approval step.
  • Thin or inconsistent data — we fix the data question first, or we pass.
  • Work where a wrong answer costs more than the manual step it replaces.

Proof

Two builds, and what they actually changed.

Trading company · UAE

Years of sales history in a database and no way to use it. We built a forecasting model on that history for inventory, pricing and campaign planning.

Inventory shortages−90%
Sales+35%
Method: demand forecast on their own historical data.Measured over the season after go-live; the forecast is the driver, not a guarantee.
Several companies · Egypt & Saudi Arabia

Customer-facing assistants with one job: talk to social and website visitors, work out who is a real buyer, and collect their details so a salesperson can follow up.

~30% fewer lead losses~35% more accurate data60% faster follow-ups
Method: qualification against criteria the client set, handoff to a person on every real buyer.Averages across several deployments, not one client’s result — each measures follow-up and lead quality differently. Talk to a reference for the detail.

Our approach

We do not start with software.

We start with how the business works, identify the real cause of the problem, and decide what needs to change before choosing the technology. Then we deliver the solution and stay involved until it truly works.

01

Diagnose

Understand what is actually happening.

02

Define

Decide what should change, and in what order.

03

Deliver

Deliver the agreed solution alongside your team.

04

Improve

Support adoption, measure results, and refine what we've delivered.

A continuous cycle from clarity to results and ongoing improvement.

Evaluation runs inside Deliver and Improve, not as a phase at the end. Not ready to build yet? We run readiness sessions and training for teams getting started, and a full assessment for corporates rolling AI out across the business.

Take the AI readiness assessment

Questions we get

Before you talk to us.

Both, and the choice is yours to make with us. A top-tier third-party model where that is the right call; a local model when the data cannot leave your infrastructure.

Glossary: Large language model

Wherever you decide it can go. If the answer is nowhere, we build on a local model inside your perimeter and log every prompt and response there.

Glossary: Data sovereignty

We check it. Answers have to trace to a real source in your material, and we measure that on an acceptance set before anything ships. Where it cannot ground an answer, it says so instead of inventing one.

Glossary: Hallucination

That is designed in advance: block, flag, or send to a person, depending on the check that failed. Anything with weight waits for human approval either way.

Glossary: Human in the loop

Yes. That is a routing decision, not a rebuild.

A first working build is typically six to ten weeks, priced per scope with the evaluation set included. We do not price the checks separately, because they are not optional.

When the data is thin, when a wrong answer is expensive, or when a rule-based automation would do the same job more reliably and cheaper. We would rather scope it smaller or pass.

Bring us one job you want AI to do.

We will tell you whether it is worth building, how we would test it, and where it should run.

Add a work email so we can reply.
We use your details to reply. Service providers help us host and route submissions as described in our Privacy Policy.

We use privacy-friendly analytics by default. May we also use cookie-based analytics to understand how the site is used? Privacy Policy